https://bit.ly/3NsvEmP
https://bit.ly/36V2wnw
https://bit.ly/3DiNWCm
https://bit.ly/3tPE67C
https://bit.ly/3iGPAEm
https://bit.ly/3IOpM3L
https://bit.ly/3Nvzrj3
https://bit.ly/3ISbOh8
https://bit.ly/3tNX5zJ
https://bit.ly/3IQ3hLR
We also don't claim that our practises are safer, more tolerant, more whatever, than anyone elses.
There is no reason on earth why couples of any orientation or preference can't have a Taken in Hand type of relationship. The slant this website has reflects the bias of it's owner/creator, and therefore attracts people with similar interests, as well as people who think we're wrong (or perverted, or sick, or any number of other insults that get thrown at people living "non-standard" lives).
What most of us here accept (I think!) is that there is no right or wrong way to conduct a relationship. No way is better or worse than any other. The only thing that matters is that the people in the relationship are happy. Horses for courses and all that.
I'm not replying because I think a Taken in Hand style relationship is better than BDSM. I'm replying because I know it is different from BDSM. Not better. Not worse. Just different.
"There is nothing either good or bad, but thinking makes it so" Hamlet, somewhere.
by ConfusedOfHomeCounties? on 2004 Dec 16 - 23:59 | reply to this comment
There are unsafe practices everywhere
Pat,
![[PukiWiki]](image/pukiwiki.png "[PukiWiki]")
